Renault Twingo 1993 vs Chevrolet Spark 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 | 0.8 - 1.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 - 75 HP | 51 - 63 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 105 NM | 69 - 87 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 16.4 seconds | 12.9 - 18.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 7.1 | 5.7 - 6.6 | |
|
Renault Twingo petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Spark. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.43 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.50 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.49 m | |
| Renault Twingo is 7 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Spark, 14 cm wider, while the height of Renault Twingo is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 170 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1096 litres | 830 litres | |
|
Renault Twingo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Twingo has 25 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Spark. The Chevrolet Spark may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Twingo (by 266 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`235 | ~ 1`217 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Twingo has
|
| |