Renault Twingo 2007 vs Volkswagen Lupo 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.0 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 - 133 HP | 50 - 125 HP | |
Torque: | 93 - 160 NM | 86 - 195 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 15 seconds | 8.5 - 17.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 6.7 | 3.0 - 7.5 | |
Renault Twingo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Lupo. On average, Renault Twingo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.60 m | 3.53 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Twingo is 7 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Twingo is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 230 litres | 130 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
959 litres | 860 litres | |
Renault Twingo has more luggage capacity. Renault Twingo has 100 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Twingo (by 99 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Twingo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Lupo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`404 | ~ 1`368 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Twingo has
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |