Renault Trafic 2015 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 145 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Renault Trafic engine produces 25 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Renault Trafic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1350 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
1480 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.00 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.96 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.97 m | 1.74 m | |
Renault Trafic is larger. Renault Trafic is 15 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 5 cm wider, while the height of Renault Trafic is 23 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1000 litres | 809 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | no data | |
Renault Trafic has more luggage capacity. Renault Trafic has 191 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Trafic is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`770 | 2`370 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 12 400 | 15 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Trafic has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |