Renault Trafic 2015 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Renault Trafic engine produces 5 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.97 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Renault Trafic is smaller, but higher. Renault Trafic is 10 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Trafic is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1000 litres | 748 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2100 litres | 4550 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Trafic has 252 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. The Chrysler Grand Voyager may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2450 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`770 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Trafic has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |