Renault Trafic 2003 vs Renault Trafic 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Trafic 2006 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Trafic 2003 engine produces 10 HP less power than Renault Trafic 2006, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Renault Trafic 2006. Due to the lower power, Renault Trafic 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 8.7 | |
| Renault Trafic 2003 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic 2006, which means that by driving the Renault Trafic 2003 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.96 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Trafic 2003 and Renault Trafic 2006 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`845 | 2`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Trafic has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |