Renault Trafic 2001 vs Toyota Previa 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Previa is a more dynamic driving. Renault Trafic engine produces 34 HP less power than Toyota Previa, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Toyota Previa. Due to the lower power, Renault Trafic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Previa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Trafic consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Previa, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Trafic could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Trafic consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Previa. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Trafic engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Trafic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Trafic 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Renault Trafic 2001 1.9 engine Toyota Previa 2003 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics. One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Previa 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Renault Trafic is larger. Renault Trafic and Toyota Previa are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`765 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Trafic has
|
Toyota Previa has
| |