Renault Trafic 2001 vs Mazda MPV 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda MPV is a more dynamic driving. Renault Trafic engine produces 54 HP less power than Mazda MPV, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Mazda MPV. Due to the lower power, Renault Trafic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda MPV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Trafic consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MPV, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Trafic could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Trafic consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MPV. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 1080 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Trafic engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | Used also on Mazda 6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Trafic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Trafic 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Renault Trafic 2001 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.78 m | |
| Renault Trafic is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda MPV, 7 cm wider, while the height of Renault Trafic is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 9 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 294 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 294 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2745 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`765 | 2`395 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Trafic has
|
Mazda MPV has
| |