Renault Trafic 2001 vs Chevrolet Astro 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 4.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Renault Trafic engine produces 108 HP less power than Chevrolet Astro, whereas torque is 149 NM less than Chevrolet Astro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 12.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 13.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Trafic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Trafic consumes 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Astro, which means that by driving the Renault Trafic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 675 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Trafic consumes 5.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Astro. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 102 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 1080 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Trafic) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Astro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Renault Trafic 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Renault Trafic 2001 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Renault Trafic is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Trafic is 4 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Astro, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Trafic is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4825 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`765 | 2`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Trafic has
|
Chevrolet Astro has
| |