Renault Trafic 2006 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Renault Trafic engine produces 35 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Despite less power, Renault Trafic reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Trafic is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Trafic consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Renault Trafic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Trafic consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 1180 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Vivaro, Nissan Primastar | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Trafic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.75 m | |
| Renault Trafic is 8 cm longer than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Trafic is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4130 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`825 | 2`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Trafic has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |