Renault Trafic 2006 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Renault Trafic engine produces 26 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Despite less power, Renault Trafic reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.8 | |
| Renault Trafic consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Trafic could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.75 m | |
| Renault Trafic is 8 cm longer than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Trafic is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4130 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`825 | 2`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Trafic has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |