Renault Trafic 2006 vs Chrysler Town & Country 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 285 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Renault Trafic engine produces 60 HP less power than Chrysler Town & Country, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Chrysler Town & Country. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 11.0 | |
|
The Renault Trafic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Trafic consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Town & Country, which means that by driving the Renault Trafic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.75 m | |
| Renault Trafic is 9 cm longer than the Chrysler Town & Country, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Trafic is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 9 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 125 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 125 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4754 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Trafic has
|
Chrysler Town & Country has
| |