Renault Trafic 2011 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Renault Trafic engine produces 55 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Renault Trafic reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Trafic consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Trafic could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Trafic consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 1090 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.74 m | |
| Renault Trafic is 7 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Trafic is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1240 litres | 809 litres | |
|
Renault Trafic has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Trafic has 431 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. The Volkswagen Sharan may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Trafic is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`790 | 2`370 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Sharan scores higher in safety tests, butRenault Trafic is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Sharan scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Trafic has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |