Renault Trafic 2011 vs Volkswagen Caravelle 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
Volkswagen Caravelle is a more dynamic driving. Renault Trafic engine produces 65 HP less power than Volkswagen Caravelle, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Volkswagen Caravelle. Due to the lower power, Renault Trafic reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.3 | |
The Renault Trafic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Trafic consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caravelle, which means that by driving the Renault Trafic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.78 m | 4.89 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.94 m | 1.99 m | |
Renault Trafic is 11 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caravelle, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Trafic is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1240 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`790 | 3`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 16 600 | 21 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Trafic has
|
Volkswagen Caravelle has
| |