Renault Trafic 2011 vs Seat Alhambra 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is a more dynamic driving. Renault Trafic engine produces 55 HP less power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Seat Alhambra. Due to the lower power, Renault Trafic reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Trafic consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Trafic could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Trafic consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 1090 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.72 m | |
| Renault Trafic is 7 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Trafic is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 9 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1240 litres | 809 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 809 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2430 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Trafic is 0.1 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`790 kg | 2`540 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`785 kg | 1`776 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`005 kg | 764 kg | |
| Renault Trafic load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem more than Seat Alhambra. Therefore, Renault Trafic is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Seat Alhambra scores higher in safety tests, butRenault Trafic is better rated in child safety tests. The Seat Alhambra scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Trafic has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |