Renault Trafic 2011 vs Renault Trafic 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
Renault Trafic 2011 engine produces 25 HP more power than Renault Trafic 2006, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Renault Trafic 2006. Despite the higher power, Renault Trafic 2011 reaches 100 km/h speed 7.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
The Renault Trafic 2006 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Trafic 2011 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic 2006, which means that by driving the Renault Trafic 2011 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Trafic 2011 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic 2006. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 90 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
1360 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
1090 km with real consumption | 1150 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.78 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.94 m | 1.96 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Trafic 2011 and Renault Trafic 2006 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1240 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`790 | 2`770 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 15 800 | 5000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Trafic has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |