Renault Scenic 2017 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Kadjar is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 15 HP less power than Renault Kadjar, but torque is 15 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.6 | |
| Renault Scenic consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Renault Scenic engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2017 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Scenic has 34 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The Renault Kadjar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 76 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`017 | 1`853 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |