Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 25 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
3.9
4.1
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Scenic consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity:
52 litres
55 litres
Full fuel tank distance:
1330 km in combined cycle
1340 km in combined cycle
1400 km on highway
1480 km on highway
Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine
Dimensions
Length:
4.41 m
4.38 m
Width:
1.87 m
1.83 m
Height:
1.65 m
1.63 m
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Scenic is 3 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity:
572 litres
432 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down
1554 litres
1684 litres
Renault Scenic has 140 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 130 litres).
Renault Scenic has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford C-Max, so Renault Scenic quality could be a bit better.
