Renault Scenic 2016 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 2 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 4.0 | |
| Renault Scenic consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1330 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen C4 Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 3 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 572 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Scenic has 35 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. The Citroen C4 Picasso may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`046 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |