Renault Scenic 2016 vs Toyota Verso 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Verso is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 16 HP less power than Toyota Verso, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Toyota Verso. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.9 | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Scenic consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Auris | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Verso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine Toyota Verso 2013 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter Toyota 1AD-FTV diesel engine, also known as the 2.0 D-4D, was produced from 2005 to 2018. In 2009, with the shift to Euro 5 emission standards, the engine was updated with piezo injectors replacing the earlier electromagnetic ones. It features an IHI RHF4 ... More about Toyota Verso 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.62 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 5 cm shorter than the Toyota Verso, 8 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 572 litres | 484 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1740 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Scenic has 88 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Verso. The Toyota Verso may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Verso (by 186 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`097 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Toyota Verso has
| |