Renault Scenic 2016 vs Renault Kangoo 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Scenic engine produces 24 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Renault Kangoo. Thanks to more power Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.6 | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Scenic consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is larger, but lower. Renault Scenic is 19 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 572 litres | 660 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 2600 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Scenic has 88 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. This could mean that the Renault Scenic uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 1046 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`097 | 1`954 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 390 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |