Renault Scenic 2016 vs Ford C-Max 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 40 HP less power than Ford C-Max, but torque is 20 NM more than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 6.1 | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Scenic consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Used also on Ford Focus | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Scenic is 3 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 572 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1684 litres | |
| Renault Scenic has 140 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 130 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`097 | 1`915 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Renault Scenic has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford C-Max, so Renault Scenic quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |