Renault Scenic 2016 vs Ford C-Max 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 5 HP less power than Ford C-Max, but torque is 45 NM more than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.5 | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Scenic consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Scenic can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Scenic version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Scenic is 3 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 572 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1684 litres | |
| Renault Scenic has 140 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 130 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`097 | 1`915 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Renault Scenic has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford C-Max, so Renault Scenic quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |