Renault Scenic 2016 vs BMW 2 series 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
BMW 2 series is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 80 HP less power than BMW 2 series, whereas torque is 140 NM less than BMW 2 series. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.9 | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Scenic consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
BMW 2 sērija 2018: This generation BMW features the Haldex Generation V proactive all-wheel-drive system, which sends 100% of torque to the front wheels as standard. The system analyzes data from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement if required. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split equally between the axles (50%/50%). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW X2 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW 2 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine BMW 2 sērija 2018 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW 2 sērija 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is larger. Renault Scenic is 5 cm longer than the BMW 2 series, 7 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 572 litres | 645 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1554 litres | 1905 litres | |
|
BMW 2 series has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Scenic uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 2 series (by 351 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW 2 series, which means Renault Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`097 kg | 2`280 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`501 kg | 1`615 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 596 kg | 665 kg | |
| Renault Scenic load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than BMW 2 series. Therefore, BMW 2 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 2 series has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
BMW 2 sērija has
| |