Renault Scenic 2018 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Kadjar is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 10 HP less power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Renault Kadjar. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.3 | |
|
The Renault Kadjar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Scenic consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 572 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Scenic has 100 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The Renault Kadjar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 76 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 1`946 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |