Renault Scenic 2018 vs Dacia Dokker 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Renault Scenic engine produces 55 HP more power than Dacia Dokker, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Dacia Dokker. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Dokker might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Renault Scenic engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is larger, but lower. Renault Scenic is 4 cm longer than the Dacia Dokker, 12 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 572 litres | 800 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 3000 litres | |
|
Dacia Dokker has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Scenic has 228 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Dokker. This could mean that the Renault Scenic uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Dokker (by 1446 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 1`899 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Dokker has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Dacia Dokker has
| |