Renault Scenic 2013 vs Ford C-Max 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Scenic engine produces 15 HP more power than Ford C-Max, but torque is 20 NM less than Ford C-Max. Thanks to more power Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 4.4 | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Scenic consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1360 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Scenic is 1 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1870 litres | 1684 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Scenic has 38 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The Ford C-Max may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 186 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`085 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Scenic scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Scenic scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |