Renault Scenic 2011 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
Renault Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Scenic engine produces 20 HP more power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Thanks to more power Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.9 | |
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Scenic consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 54 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1330 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
1460 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 407 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Renault Scenic 2011 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Renault Scenic 2011 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.34 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
Renault Scenic is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Scenic is 6 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 437 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.5 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Renault Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`040 | 1`300 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | below average | |
Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara Picasso has serious deffects in 165 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3400 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |