Renault Scenic 2009 vs Peugeot 1007 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Scenic engine produces 40 HP more power than Peugeot 1007, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Peugeot 1007. Thanks to more power Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 4.8 | |
|
The Peugeot 1007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Scenic consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 1007, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 407, Citroen Xsara Picasso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2009 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 3.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is larger. Renault Scenic is 61 cm longer than the Peugeot 1007, 16 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 437 litres | 154 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1837 litres | 1192 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage capacity. Renault Scenic has 283 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 1007. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 645 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.3 metres more than that of the Peugeot 1007. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`092 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 1007 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Peugeot 1007 has
| |