Renault Scenic 2001 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Renault Scenic and Renault Grand Scenic have the same engine power, but Renault Scenic torque is 6 NM less than Renault Grand Scenic. Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.7 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Scenic consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Renault Grand Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Megane, Renault Espace | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2001 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Scenic 2001 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Scenic is 39 cm shorter than the Renault Grand Scenic, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Scenic is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 208 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 208 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2063 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.6 metres less than that of the Renault Grand Scenic, which means Renault Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 2`128 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |