Renault Scenic 2001 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 31 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, but torque is 22 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 9.2 | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Scenic consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 44 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Runner engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 12 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Scenic is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1800 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |