Renault Scenic 2001 vs Mazda Premacy 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda Premacy is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 5 HP more power than Mazda Premacy, but torque is 30 NM less than Mazda Premacy. Despite the higher power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Scenic consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Renault Scenic 2001 1.9 engine Mazda Premacy 2001 2.0 engine: The engine is reliable if you use quality diesel. Turbine life is not very long, however. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.60 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 17 cm shorter than the Mazda Premacy, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Scenic is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1848 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`845 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Mazda Premacy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda Premacy, so Mazda Premacy quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.3/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |