Renault Scenic 2001 vs Toyota Corolla Verso 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Scenic engine produces 15 HP more power than Toyota Corolla Verso, but torque is 15 NM less than Toyota Corolla Verso. Thanks to more power Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Scenic consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Scenic engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Renault Scenic 2001 1.9 engine Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics. One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Corolla Verso 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.61 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 7 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla Verso, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Scenic is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 417 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means Renault Scenic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.3/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Toyota Corolla Verso has
| |