Renault Scenic 2001 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 3 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Star, but torque is 15 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Star. Despite the higher power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.52 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 12 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Scenic is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |