Renault Scenic 2001 vs Nissan Almera 1995
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 136 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Renault Scenic engine produces 11 HP more power than Nissan Almera, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Nissan Almera. Despite the higher power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Scenic consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | Used also on Nissan Primera | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2001 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Scenic 2001 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is larger. Renault Scenic is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Almera, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 26 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 340 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`595 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Nissan Almera has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Nissan Almera, so Nissan Almera quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.3/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |