Renault Scenic 2001 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 40 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 77 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Scenic consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 40 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2001 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Scenic 2001 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Scenic is 43 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Scenic is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 240 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.3/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |