Renault Scenic 2001 vs Honda Stream 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Honda Stream is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 46 HP less power than Honda Stream, whereas torque is 44 NM less than Honda Stream. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Scenic consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Stream, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Stream. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda CR-V, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2001 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Scenic 2001 1.6 engine Honda Stream 2001 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda Stream 2001 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.59 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 40 cm shorter than the Honda Stream, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Scenic is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 158 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 158 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1520 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.3 metres less than that of the Honda Stream. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Honda Stream has
| |