Renault Scenic 2004 vs BMW 5 series 1996
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Scenic engine produces 13 HP more power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 80 NM more than BMW 5 series. Thanks to more power Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Scenic) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 5 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Megane, Renault Grand Espace | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW Z3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2004 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Scenic 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.44 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 52 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Scenic is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 5 series has more luggage space. Renault Scenic has 30 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.3 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 5 series has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 5200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.4/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |