Renault Scenic 2005 vs Renault Clio 2009
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Scenic engine produces 45 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Scenic consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is larger. Renault Scenic is 3 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 9 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 439 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Scenic has 9 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. This could mean that the Renault Scenic uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Renault Clio has
| |