Renault Scenic 2003 vs Volkswagen Touran 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 20 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 127 mm (5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.65 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 13 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Touran, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1840 litres | 1989 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Renault Scenic has 265 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 149 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran, which means Renault Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`010 kg | 2`210 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`430 kg | 1`561 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 580 kg | 649 kg | |
| Renault Scenic load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Volkswagen Touran. Therefore, Volkswagen Touran is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volkswagen Touran has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touran, so Volkswagen Touran quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.4/10 | 8.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |
