Renault Scenic 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 20 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is smaller. Renault Scenic is 26 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Scenic is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 955 litres | |
| Renault Scenic has 126 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 885 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 1.1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Renault Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 205 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 4800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.4/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |