Renault Scenic 2003 vs Seat Altea 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Seat Altea is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 20 HP less power than Seat Altea, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Seat Altea. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.57 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 2 cm shorter than the Seat Altea, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Altea. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Seat Altea has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Seat Altea, so Seat Altea quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.4/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Seat Altea has
| |