Renault Scenic 2003 vs Ford C-Max 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Renault Scenic engine produces 5 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Ford C-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
920 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 4.33 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.60 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Scenic is 7 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Scenic is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 460 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 1620 litres | |
Renault Scenic has 30 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 220 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`995 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 5.4/10 | 7.6/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |