Renault Scenic 2003 vs Ford C-Max 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 HP | 109 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
Renault Scenic engine produces 11 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Ford C-Max. Despite the higher power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 4.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
1200 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
920 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 4.33 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.60 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Scenic is 7 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Scenic is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 1620 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 5.4/10 | 7.6/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |