Renault Scenic 2003 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
| Renault Scenic engine produces 10 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Despite less power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2003 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Scenic 2003 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is smaller. Renault Scenic is 21 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Scenic is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Renault Scenic has 70 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Renault Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.4/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |