Renault Scenic 2005 vs BMW 5 series 2000
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 31 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 40 NM less than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1480 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 1110 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Scenic) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 5 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.44 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 52 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Scenic is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 5 series has more luggage space. Renault Scenic has 30 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.3 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 5 series has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 5200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.4/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |