Renault Scenic 2006 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 138 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Scenic engine produces 12 HP more power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Thanks to more power Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that by driving the Renault Scenic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic 2006 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is smaller. Renault Scenic is 21 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Scenic is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Renault Scenic has 94 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Renault Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.5/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |