Renault Scenic 2006 vs Renault Megane 2006
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 191 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Scenic engine produces 30 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 79 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Scenic consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Megane, Renault Grand Espace | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Espace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2006 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Scenic 2006 2.0 engine Renault Megane 2006 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Megane 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Renault Scenic is larger. Renault Scenic is 5 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Scenic is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 1190 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage capacity. Renault Scenic has 76 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 650 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Megane. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.5/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Renault Megane has
| |