Renault Scenic 2006 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 135 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 191 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
Renault Scenic engine produces 8 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Despite less power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 8.0 | |
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Scenic consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 460'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C4 Picasso engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 20 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Megane, Renault Espace | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 407, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Renault Scenic 2006 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Scenic 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 4.47 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.68 m | |
Renault Scenic is smaller. Renault Scenic is 21 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Scenic is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 500 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Renault Scenic has 94 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Renault Scenic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | low | |
Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.5/10 | 8.2/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |