Renault Scenic 2006 vs Renault Kangoo 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is more dynamic to drive. Renault Scenic engine produces 25 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Renault Kangoo. Thanks to more power Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
| By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 183 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kangoo can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kangoo version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Kangoo 2008 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Kangoo 2008 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.80 m | |
| Renault Scenic is 5 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Scenic is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 438 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 1977 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Scenic has 32 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. This could mean that the Renault Scenic uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 137 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`982 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |