Renault Scenic 2006 vs Honda FR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Honda FR-V is a more dynamic driving. Renault Scenic engine produces 30 HP less power than Honda FR-V, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Honda FR-V. Due to the lower power, Renault Scenic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Scenic consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda FR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Scenic could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Scenic consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda FR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | Used also on Honda Civic | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2006 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Scenic 2006 1.6 engine Honda FR-V 2007 1.8 engine: The engine is demanding on the quality of petrol and oil used. Use of poor quality fuel can lead to repairs of the lambda sensor and catalytic converter. The chain tensioner and the engine cushions have a ... More about Honda FR-V 2007 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Scenic is 3 cm shorter than the Honda FR-V, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Scenic is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 439 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 1049 litres | |
| Renault Scenic has 33 litres less trunk space than the Honda FR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 791 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Scenic is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda FR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`925 | 1`975 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Scenic has
|
Honda FR-V has
| |